Stolen Piglets in Copenhagen: Controversial Art Exhibit Sparks Outrage and Activist Rescue
In a recent turn of events, three piglets that were part of a provocative art installation in Copenhagen have been stolen by animal rights […]
In a recent turn of events, three piglets that were part of a provocative art installation in Copenhagen have been stolen by animal rights activists, leading to the closure of the exhibition. The installation, created by Chilean-born artist Marco Evaristti, aimed to highlight the suffering caused by mass meat production by allowing the piglets to starve to death as part of the exhibit.
The exhibition, titled “And Now You Care,” featured a makeshift cage constructed from shopping carts containing the three piglets—named Lucia, Simon, and Benjamin. Evaristti intended this display to provoke thought and raise awareness about the cruelties inherent in modern pig farming practices in Denmark, where approximately 25,000 piglets die daily due to the conditions in which they are bred.
The theft was orchestrated by animal rights activists with the assistance of Evaristti’s friend, Caspar Steffensen. Steffensen, moved by his 10-year-old daughter’s plea to save the piglets, collaborated with the activists to remove the animals from the gallery secretly. He stated, “I could not allow the three animals to face a painful death after my daughter begged me to ‘make sure the piggies won’t die.'”
Upon discovering the theft, Evaristti reported the incident to the police and expressed initial disappointment over the closure of his exhibition. However, he later reflected on the situation, acknowledging that the piglets would now have a chance at a happier life. He remarked, “I thought about it for a few hours and realized that at least this way the piglets would have a happy life.”
The exhibition sparked significant controversy, drawing criticism from various animal rights organizations. While these groups appreciated the intent to raise awareness about animal welfare, they condemned the method of allowing live animals to suffer as part of an art display. Birgitte Damm, a spokesperson for Animal Protection Denmark, stated, “We do not agree that three piglets, three individual living beings, should be starved and prevented from drinking until they die from it. It is illegal and it is abuse of the animals.”
In response to the incident, Evaristti is contemplating alternative approaches to convey his message. One idea involves presenting dead piglets sourced from meat processing plants to the public. Another proposal includes purchasing live piglets, not to starve, but to auction them to the highest bidder who promises them a happy life. Evaristti noted that he has received numerous hate messages from around the world, indicating that people may not fully grasp that his art is about animal rights.
This incident has ignited a broader discussion on the ethical boundaries of art and the lengths to which artists should go to shed light on critical societal issues. While the intention to provoke thought and inspire change is a common objective in contemporary art, the methods employed can sometimes blur the lines between raising awareness and causing harm, prompting debates about morality, legality, and artistic expression.
Sources
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(929x577:931x579)/Marco-Evaristti-exhibition-030525-86c551877c514df8af9a7fa603f73421.jpg)